Archived | Families For Effective Autism Treatment (FEAT) Newsletter: Critics call state’s autism settlement a ‘sham’ | Circa July 20, 2011 #NotAnAutisticAlly

Once again the Department Heads and Public Officials Californians entrusted to protect our precious children have been busy in back rooms collaborating with and protecting the very entities we charged them with watching.

Our Governor and his Department of Managed Health Care have turned a blind eye to the damage being done to our Children with Autism by the exclusion of proven Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) by the profit driven Insurance Industry.

These Sweetheart back door agreements, for the Insurance Moguls, must be put in check.

Parents of Children with Autism have a steadfast ally in Senate Pro Temp Darrell Steinberg. Senator Steinberg has continued to call the Insurance Executives and State Officials to task for their failure to provide necessary and proven services for Children with Autism. The heavy burden being placed on the State Agencies to service these forgotten children with autism is financially unsustainable. 

Please read on;

Critics call state’s autism settlement a ‘sham’

Wyatt Buchanan, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

 Sacramento — Leading autism and consumer advocacy organizations in California are calling a settlement agreed to last week between the state and Blue Shield of California to expand coverage for autism treatment a “sham” that will not result in more therapy for people with the condition.

In a letter to Gov. Jerry Brown, the advocates say the settlement – which was announced and described by officials with the Department of Managed Health Care at a legislative hearing last week – “contains such onerous requirements for families with autistic children that it will lead to delays, interruptions and continued denials of treatment.

“The agreement, which some at the hearing called a potential breakthrough, was later posted on the department’s website. The letter sent to Brown this week was signed by representatives of Consumer Watchdog, the Alliance of California Autism Organizations, the Special Needs Network and a parent of an autistic child.”

With my own experience and with helping other families that have been through this, (the agreement) has the same loopholes and problems that have been barriers for people to have access to services in the first place,” said Sally Brammell, a San Francisco parent who signed the letter and said she spent 12 months jumping through hoops to get her son medical treatment.

The department announced Tuesday that it had reached a second and virtually identical settlement with Anthem Blue Cross, and officials defended the agreements.

The department “disagrees with the characterizations brought by some advocacy organizations regarding settlements reached to provide necessary services to families affected by autism,” said Lynne Randolph, spokesperson for the California Department of Managed Health Care. “With the settlements, the (department) opted to take the path which would lead us to immediate coverage for many more children and not bring us back to endless legal challenges or roadblocks from health plans.”

Blue Shield of California maintains that the agreement is intended to cover any customer who needs the services, though a spokesman said court proceedings would continue. 

‘Doing it in good faith’

Tom Epstein, vice president of public affairs for Blue Shield, said the company agreed to provide “services we don’t believe are legally required. We are doing it voluntarily and doing it in good faith to get people access to care they believe they need while these issues are litigated.”At issue is a specific treatment known as applied behavioral analysis that experts call the most effective treatment for autism.

However, insurance companies say it is not a medical treatment. Autism diagnoses have been growing rapidly, and about 1 child in 110 have an autism spectrum disorder, according to the Centers for Disease Control.

The behavioral treatments are specifically designed for each patient and often take months of reinforcement. Therapists seek to focus on the environment surrounding a certain behavior – such as what happens before and what happens after successful communication – and use that to reinforce the behavior. 

It’s an intensive treatment that has been described as rewiring the brain.

Advocates say the main problem with the settlement is that it requires applied behavioral analysis providers to have a license or be supervised by a licensed individual.

However, no state license exists for the therapy and advocates do not believe other licensed medical professionals will take on that duty.

“It is unlikely that licensed clinical social workers, for example, would be willing and able to supervise and pay for liability insurance covering services done by others and outside of the scope of their practice and expertise,” the letter states.

Kristin Jacobson, who represents the Alliance of California Autism Organizations, which is made up of about 40 groups, predicted that under those criteria, of the tens of thousands of children who need the treatment, only a few would find a provider to offer it.

No guarantees

“I would say significantly less than 1 percent” of children who need the therapy will get it, she said.

Advocates also said the agreement does not ensure that there will be a network of providers for the services.

State Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, chairs a special committee on autism that has been working on the issue. He said he believes the advocates are correct in their assessment, and he plans to take further legislative action in the near future.

Steinberg already has a bill that would require insurers to cover behavioral therapy. He called the agreements “forward movement” but added, “This very real issue about access to qualified providers … should not wait until January or sometime next year. It needs to be resolved on behalf of families and children before this year’s legislative session is over.

E-mail Wyatt Buchanan at

This article appeared on page C – 4 of the San Francisco Chronicle

The following information is a reminder of your current mailing list subscription: You are subscribed to the following list: 

FEAT-FMC Newsletter

The information and resources on the Families for Effective Autism Treatment-Fresno/Madera County (FEAT-FMC) Website are for educational and informational purposes only. Information provided through The Site should not be used as a substitute for care by a qualified Developmental Pediatrician, Pediatric Neurologist, Behavioral Psychologist, Behavior Analyst, Speech and Language Pathologist, Attorney, or other appropriate professional.


Autistic people have fought the inclusion of ABA in therapy for us since before Autism Speaks, and other non-Autistic-led autism organizations, started lobbying legislation to get it covered by insurances and Medicaid. 

ABA is a myth originally sold to parents that it would keep their Autistic child out of an institution. Today, parents are told that with early intervention therapy their child will either be less Autistic or no longer Autistic by elementary school, and can be mainstreamed in typical education classes. ABA is very expensive to pay out of pocket. Essentially, Autism Speaks has justified the big price tag up front will offset the overall burden on resources for an Autistic’s lifetime. The recommendation for this therapy is 40 hours a week for children and toddlers.

The original study that showed the success rate of ABA to be at 50% has never been replicated. In fact, the study of ABA by United States Department of Defense was denounced as a failure. Not just once, but multiple times. Simply stated: ABA doesn’t workIn study after repeated study: ABA (conversion therapy) doesn’t work. 

What more recent studies do show: Autistics who experienced ABA therapy are at high risk to develop PTSD and other lifelong trauma-related conditions. Historically, the autism organizations promoting ABA as a cure or solution have silenced Autistic advocates’ opposition. ABA is also known as gay conversion therapy.

The ‘cure’ for Autistics not born yet is the prevention of birth. 

The ‘cure’ is a choice to terminate a pregnancy based on ‘autism risk.’ The cure is abortion. This is the same ‘cure’ society has for Down Syndrome. 

This is eugenics 2021. Instead of killing Autistics and disabled children in gas chambers or ‘mercy killings’ like in Aktion T4, it’ll happen at the doctor’s office, quietly, one Autistic baby at a time. Different approaches yes, but still eugenics and the extinction of an entire minority group of people.

Fact: You can’t cure Autistics from being Autistic.

Fact: You can’t recover an Autistic from being Autistic.

Fact: You can groom an Autistic to mask and hide their traits. Somewhat. … however, this comes at the expense of the Autistic child, promotes Autistic Burnout (this should not be confused with typical burnout, Autistic Burnout can kill Autistics), and places the Autistic child at high risk for PTSD and other lifelong trauma-related conditions.

[Note: Autism is NOT a disease, but a neurodevelopmental difference and disability.]

Fact: Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.